11/27/2011

NEXT POST
Yanukovych Restore Order In The Organs President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych expressed his opinion on the law enforcement bodies of Ukraine. President of Ukraine Victor Yanukovich said that he is very dissatisfied with the work of law enforcement. And more even demanded that law enforcement agencies of Ukraine took very strong measures against criminals. President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych said at a meeting held for managers law enforcement and other government agencies. The main theme of the meeting were issues to crime and strengthen the combat against drugs. Meeting held in Kiev, under the chairmanship President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovich. According to the President, Viktor Yanukovych, the fight against crime and drug trafficking that was carried out until now is haphazard and random, and therefore very inefficiently. President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych said that so far has not seen any improvements in policing. Also the President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych said he was also very displeased with the Ministry of Health in the matter combat drug addiction. Also the President of Ukraine Victor Yanukovich said that it is also not satisfied with the state of affairs on the rule of law in the state. President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovich suggested that, perhaps, and all 45 million citizens of Ukraine are not satisfied with the rule of law in the state. The Head of State Viktor Yanukovych said, according to statistics in 2010 in Ukraine increased the number of violent crimes by 40% compared to last year. According to the statistics of AR Crimea, Dnipropetrovsk region, Kirovohrad region, this problem is particularly difficult for some reason. Also the President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych has said that the blame for this are the heads of the agencies that are negligent in their duties. And with that urgently need to do something.
PREVIOUS POST
Protectionism In its proposals on ways out of economic crisis, global politics, everything seems to condemn protectionism, but in fact their governments act exactly the opposite. Protectionism - it's non-market methods protect domestic producers from international competition. Now almost all the states are bankrupt protect their industries, increase in customs duty to protect national markets to the detriment of the common cause of the crisis, delaying it for an indefinite period. WTO predicts that by 2009 as a result of expected 9-percent drop in world trade. The most characteristic example of protectionism - it Russian auto industry. The Russian president travels to London for a summit of G20, which condemns the world protectionism, but the Russian government before it lifts duties on foreign cars. Moreover, the Prime Minister during Summit highlights of the 24 billion rubles for the production of cars of the past century. These funds could be organized in a modern production with demand products. And so, like most of the funds will go to "wind," working capital for the production of obsolete vehicles in the factory, which must be reoriented (and retrained staff) are still the 1990s. But with high tribunes hear appeals using the crisis to increase domestic demand. Excuse me, than to increase domestic demand, rarity "Lada"? In addition, the recent increase in customs duties on imported cars instead of expected increase in demand for Russian cars has led to higher prices for "Lada" and "Lada". It turns out that artificially increasing the competitiveness of domestic production does not mean that it will be cheaper for the consumer and they will be in demand. Now would all the money to throw to build the infrastructure for a modern economy, so no, we are saving the "town-forming" enterprises, but in fact hide a "head in the sand"...