In its proposals on ways out of economic crisis, global politics, everything seems to condemn protectionism, but in fact their governments act exactly the opposite. Protectionism - it's non-market methods protect domestic producers from international competition. Now almost all the states are bankrupt protect their industries, increase in customs duty to protect national markets to the detriment of the common cause of the crisis, delaying it for an indefinite period. WTO predicts that by 2009 as a result of expected 9-percent drop in world trade. The most characteristic example of protectionism - it Russian auto industry. The Russian president travels to London for a summit of G20, which condemns the world protectionism, but the Russian government before it lifts duties on foreign cars. Moreover, the Prime Minister during Summit highlights of the 24 billion rubles for the production of cars of the past century. These funds could be organized in a modern production with demand products.
And so, like most of the funds will go to "wind," working capital for the production of obsolete vehicles in the factory, which must be reoriented (and retrained staff) are still the 1990s. But with high tribunes hear appeals using the crisis to increase domestic demand. Excuse me, than to increase domestic demand, rarity "Lada"? In addition, the recent increase in customs duties on imported cars instead of expected increase in demand for Russian cars has led to higher prices for "Lada" and "Lada". It turns out that artificially increasing the competitiveness of domestic production does not mean that it will be cheaper for the consumer and they will be in demand. Now would all the money to throw to build the infrastructure for a modern economy, so no, we are saving the "town-forming" enterprises, but in fact hide a "head in the sand" by plotting problem-solving. World Bank gives the following figures: 63 percent of the world's anti-crisis measures aimed to help "drowned" companies and banks, and only 12 percent goes to the rescue and retraining workers whose jobs.
And so, like most of the funds will go to "wind," working capital for the production of obsolete vehicles in the factory, which must be reoriented (and retrained staff) are still the 1990s. But with high tribunes hear appeals using the crisis to increase domestic demand. Excuse me, than to increase domestic demand, rarity "Lada"? In addition, the recent increase in customs duties on imported cars instead of expected increase in demand for Russian cars has led to higher prices for "Lada" and "Lada". It turns out that artificially increasing the competitiveness of domestic production does not mean that it will be cheaper for the consumer and they will be in demand. Now would all the money to throw to build the infrastructure for a modern economy, so no, we are saving the "town-forming" enterprises, but in fact hide a "head in the sand" by plotting problem-solving. World Bank gives the following figures: 63 percent of the world's anti-crisis measures aimed to help "drowned" companies and banks, and only 12 percent goes to the rescue and retraining workers whose jobs.
Posted by: |