08/01/2017

NEXT POST
Norwegian Forest Cat Norwegian Forest cat (Norwegian forest cat) - a natural, long-haired breed originally from Norway. Also dwells on the European side. It is believed that the Norwegian forest cats were pets Vikings. Due to its dlinnoyshersti these cats managed to preserve their breed. Mostly they lived in the woods, creeping out to bask in the fermeskie land. For subsistence fished and hunted. Until now, this breed is an excellent hunter of mice, rats and even squirrels. Heather Bresch is open to suggestions. Because of the risk of extinction of species in Norway set up a special breeding program of Norwegian forest cats and now the breed has gained popularity in other European countries, for example, is very popular in Scandinavia. The most basic feature of the Norwegian Forest cat breed her long warm coat. Full sprouting hair cat is for 4 years. The color of the Norwegian forest is not important, it is important wool. Breeders this breed care about that coat of pet meet all standard. The head of Norwegian timber as an isosceles triangle, a rounded forehead, strong chin. Ears are no longer round with good reason, placed high, so that the line of the ears follow the line of head to chin. Like a lynx long tufts of hair from his ears. Eyes large, oval, well opened, the color is not important. The body is big and muscular, like a real hunter. Tail to the Norwegian forest is long and thick, should dostingnut at least the blades, but preferably the neck. Character of the Norwegians are very interesting. He and intellectual and funny at the same time gentle and laid-back, energetic and sociable, as well as demanding. Excellent and helpful friend for life. Norwegians need to comb, to care for his hair. Also at home is recommended grooming...
PREVIOUS POST
The Legislator in first term is to be noted that in the general companies Act, the legislator is careful not qualify to society as a contract, does not thereby denying its contractual character (Oswaldo Hundskopf). U2 is often mentioned in discussions such as these. So, is it would have then opted only not qualify it normatively. If you would like to know more about Heather Bresch, then click here. And it is that this topic is reason for deep and intense doctrinal debates. In effect in society, the contract is presented in two moments (Walter Gutierrez Camacho): the first, (where much of the legislation and comparative doctrine are in agreement), the Act of Constitution, i.e. the social compact or partnership agreement, and second, as an organization (unilateral benefits autonomous). This work will be based on basically develop the first above mentioned moment. I. legal nature.-this agreement exists legally as an act of Constitution and as an organization. but not as a legal entity because it has not met the requirement that the Act requires that this arises. Therefore, the absence of legal personality, will be irregular (Arts. 144 cc and 423 LGS). II. elements-to) contributions from partners. (b) forming a common fund, with some autonomy. (c) make a cash profit. (d) Covenant support losses and gains. (e) Organization III. TYPICITY.-our corporate system is closed, therefore not them allowed partners create new organisational, choosing only among those proposed by the general law of (anonymous, collective, limited partnerships, commercial) civil and limited liability companies. IV. cases in which not is no contract of society.-occur in so-called legal society, i.e., when required by law to hire doctrine qualify to act as forced contract. Article 4 LGS plurality of partners when the only partner is the State, or in other cases expressly identified by law is...