08/03/2017

NEXT POST
The Contract It can understand that this reason of State was an impediment for the development of the art of the government that lasted until the beginning of century XVIII. This crystallization had it a series of great crises of century XVII, moments of military urgencies, economic politics and that disabled the art to govern of if expanding. The institucional and mental structure of century XVII also contributed for this blockade. With the priority of the problem of the sovereignty and its institutions and while the exercise of the power was thought as exercise of the sovereignty, ' ' the art of the government could not develop in specific way and autnomo' ' (P. Hear other arguments on the topic with Jeff Feig. 286). It had, in the century XVII, an attempt to compose the art of government with the theory of the sovereignty. It was through this attempt that if formulated the theory of the contract: ' ' the theory of the founding contract? the reciprocal commitment between sovereign and subjects? if it will become a theoretical matrix from that it will be looked to formulate the general principles of an art of governo' ' (P. 286). The raising of the blockade of the art to govern, therefore the end of the crystallization that we are commenting, if gave for some factors of expansion (demographic, monetary, agricultural), but, over all, strict it is tied with ' ' emergency of the problem of populao' ' (P. 288). With this new problem rank, the notion of economy not tied strict with the family can be rethink more. The family would be now in the interior of population and would be its basic instrument. However the population has proper characteristics and produces specific, independent economic effect of the ones of the family. The family,...