Management of the Knowledge: Context and antecedents. Diverse authors between whom they are Peter Drucker, Alvin Toffler, Robert Reich; they speak of the sprouting of a new type of economy or society. Drucker denominates Society of the Knowledge. This one is distinguished of the previous ones because in her the knowledge plays a role essential. This author he maintains, that the new economy the knowledge not only is another resource besides the traditional factors of production (earth, work and capital), but the unique valid resource in the present. Its argument is that the fact that the knowledge has become the resource instead of to be only a resource, it is what causes that the new society is unique in their class.
For Toffler (1990), it maintains like Drucker, that the knowledge is the source of the power of more high quality and the key for the change that will occur in the power. Its opinion is that the knowledge left of being an element more of the power of the money and the power of the muscular force, to become his essence, and is why anywhere in the world the battle is made more arduous control the knowledge and mass media. Toffler considers that the knowledge is the new substitute of the other resources. An endless ones of investigations, agrees in affirming that the future it will belong to the people who own the knowledge they create and it permanently. In a society of the knowledge, the worker is the most important assets, in the definition of worker with knowledge includes a person who knows how to assign knowledge to productive uses. Also they consider that the international competition will be defined according to the advantage, as far as knowledge one talks about, that a nation generates in the future. It is therefore that for decades the society has been coming preparing conscious or unconsciously so nowadays we know like the society of the knowledge, society in which the organizations are exhibited to new exigencies, new landlords of behavior, as much of its members as of their users, beneficiaries or clients and new paradigms in the system economic and social, national as as much international.
For Toffler (1990), it maintains like Drucker, that the knowledge is the source of the power of more high quality and the key for the change that will occur in the power. Its opinion is that the knowledge left of being an element more of the power of the money and the power of the muscular force, to become his essence, and is why anywhere in the world the battle is made more arduous control the knowledge and mass media. Toffler considers that the knowledge is the new substitute of the other resources. An endless ones of investigations, agrees in affirming that the future it will belong to the people who own the knowledge they create and it permanently. In a society of the knowledge, the worker is the most important assets, in the definition of worker with knowledge includes a person who knows how to assign knowledge to productive uses. Also they consider that the international competition will be defined according to the advantage, as far as knowledge one talks about, that a nation generates in the future. It is therefore that for decades the society has been coming preparing conscious or unconsciously so nowadays we know like the society of the knowledge, society in which the organizations are exhibited to new exigencies, new landlords of behavior, as much of its members as of their users, beneficiaries or clients and new paradigms in the system economic and social, national as as much international.
Posted by: |