10/19/2018

NEXT POST
The Contract It can understand that this reason of State was an impediment for the development of the art of the government that lasted until the beginning of century XVIII. This crystallization had it a series of great crises of century XVII, moments of military urgencies, economic politics and that disabled the art to govern of if expanding. The institucional and mental structure of century XVII also contributed for this blockade. With the priority of the problem of the sovereignty and its institutions and while the exercise of the power was thought as exercise of the sovereignty, ' ' the art of the government could not develop in specific way and autnomo' ' (P. 286). It had, in the century XVII, an attempt to compose the art of government with the theory of the sovereignty. It was through this attempt that if formulated the theory of the contract: ' ' the theory of the founding contract? the reciprocal commitment between sovereign and subjects? if it will become a theoretical matrix from that it will be looked to formulate the general principles of an art of governo' ' (P. 286). The raising of the blockade of the art to govern, therefore the end of the crystallization that we are commenting, if gave for some factors of expansion (demographic, monetary, agricultural), but, over all, strict it is tied with ' ' emergency of the problem of populao' ' (P. 288). With this new problem rank, the notion of economy not tied strict with the family can be rethink more. The family would be now in the interior of population and would be its basic instrument. However the population has proper characteristics and produces specific, independent economic effect of the ones of the family. The family, then, passes of economic model of the art to...
PREVIOUS POST
Social Being The necessities leave of being individual to be social. Thus, the human being is delimited by the social rules, getting dull great part of thinking auto-reflexive about function of one to think technician, only, managing of mine, its and ours to think. The social rules, in turn, beyond organizing the social conviviality, structuralizing the values and concepts of family, also take care of to the interests of the dominant system. Into the current moment, the focus falls again little in the human being, more in the economic one. The social system, when having as main focus production and the consumption of capital goods, if structure, therefore, with the support of these necessities, as much in the scope of the education and the valuation of the human being as in the determination of the proper rules. Consequently, pseudo-men are formed who do not obtain to reflect on the proper life and to establish limits for this social system that everything can. They are not capable to offer resistance to the interests of who withholds the power, that is, of who he represents the domain. Interesting! But, if by chance, he will have some idea or attitude that intervenes with the established intentions, soon creates a law, that he will prevent that he has some effect, capable to damage the dominant system, mainly in its economic aspect. The economic interests are above of the individuals, the nature and even of the proper life. The life more than what is never calculated in economic ciphers. There deferred payment a great danger, a time that the difference between legal and the illegal one is established exclusively by laws. After all! Which is the life ideal? The current changes more are worried about profit of capital of what with human profits. We are living deeply...